As Chief Justice David Maraga leaves office on Monday, January 11, Kenyans are going to remember his defiant-style leadership that mostly had him at loggerheads with the executive arm of government.From writing a letter advising President Uhuru Kenyatta to dissolve Parliament to ranting against the President over his office’s slashed budget, Maraga proved to be a force to be reckoned with.Unknown to many, however, was the outgoing CJ’s first show of bold leadership in which he refused to live in a Ksh310 mansion that occupants of the office are expected to reside in.1. The Mansion A look into the Chief Justice home in Runda, NairobiTwitter From photos seen by Kenyans.co.ke, the mansion, located in Runda, spots a special driveway and has a seemingly unkempt swimming pool on its compound.The house remains occupied only by a farm-hand and a number of police officers who keep guard of the premises.It was reportedly purchased from Machakos Senator Johnstone Muthama in a transaction that raised a lot of eyebrows and attracted the attention of the Ethics and Anti-Corruption Commission (EACC) in 2013.In January 2020, Judiciary Chief Registrar Anne Amadi confirmed that the house had stayed vacant because it was in an inhabitable position due to budget cuts.Throughout his four-year reign, Maraga lived in his private home in Karen.2. Ruling to overturn 2017 presidential results Supreme Court judges from left: Njoki Ndung’u, Smokin Wanjala, Philomena Mwilu, David Maraga, Jackton Ojwang’ and Isaac Lenaola. Photo published on March 21, 2019.Daily Nation The marking point in the career of the CJ was, however, marked in 2017 when his bench cancelled the presidential elections that President Uhuru Kenyatta had been announced the winner. It was the first time that a court had made such a momentous decision in Africa. Maraga’s team annulled the elections due to what it termed as irregularities ordering another within 60 days. In the repeat elections, former Prime Minister Raila Odinga refused to participate claiming that opponents were preparing to rig.The decision stirred a political storm at the time with Uhuru vowing to respect its decision but branding the judges as crooks.The outgoing CJ had noted that the Independent Electoral and Boundaries Commission (IEBC) had failed “to conduct the presidential election in a manner consistent with the dictates of the constitution.”Raila would later attempt to swear himself in as the people’s president in 2018 before later calling a truce with Uhuru in a special handshake that has stayed to this day.3. Complaint to Uhuru over budget cuts President Uhuru Kenyatta and Chief Justice David MaragaFacebook The outgoing CJ’s differences with the President would in November 2019 manifest again after the latter called for a press complain to lament of extreme budgetary complaints.In his complaint, Maraga claimed that he was struggling with footing various bills including that of wifi.Maraga disclosed that the budget cuts imposed on the Judiciary were hurting service delivery countrywide.”Here is where a CJ calls Treasury and no one is picking my calls. What else am I expected to do?”“Unless the budget cuts are reversed, we do not have money for fuel, we will not have mobile courts, we will not have the court of appeal circuits, we will not be able to pay for wi-fi for the e-filing and e-payments and plans to automate courts will halt,” he stated.Maraga argued that the Judiciary did not demand a lot of money from the state explaining that they would comfortably survive on a budget ranging between Ksh5 billion and Ksh6 billion every year.4. Letter to dissolve Parliament Chief Justice David Maraga addresses a gathering in Nyamira County in December 2020File In September 2020, the CJ always made headlines after he penned a letter to Uhuru asking him to dissolve the current Parliament.He argued that the legislature had contravened the Constitution by failing to enforce the two-thirds gender rule.”The petitions are based on the ground that, despite four Court orders compelling Parliament to enact the legislation required to implement the two-thirds gender rule in accordance with Article 27(3) read together with Articles 81(b) and 100 of the constitution, Parliament has blatantly failed, refused and/or neglected to do so.”Your Excellency, “the two-thirds gender rule” is an acronym for the constitutional imperative which prohibits any form of discrimination in the appointive and elective positions in our country on the basis of one’s gender,” read Maraga’s letter in part.Uhuru is, however, yet to act on the letter.5. Baby mama drama The Supreme Court of Kenya. Thursday, February 20, 2020.Simon Kiragu In Mid-2020, a woman identified as Mary Kwamboka Onyancha, went to the entrance of the Supreme Court gate in Nairobi and wailed claiming that she was singlehandedly raising a child she allegedly sired with the outgoing CJ.The issue made headlines in June 2020 although it was later thrown out of court after Kwamboka failed to file the case properly.The court found that the complainant who was suing the CJ for child support had not properly filed the case as she had failed to pay the requisite fee of Ksh655.Lawyer Danstan Omari who was representing the CJ sought the case to be dismissed after the accuser failed to show up in court.Among the errors Omari noted in the case included, was a fictitious registrar of births by the name F.O Shamwata in the country.