PoliticsUganda News

Opinion: Proposed SOPs for religious organisations contradict Biblical pattern

By Emmy Emuron 
After several months of conducting private prayers burrowed in the comfort or, for some, discomfort of their homes, the declaration of a partial re-opening of houses of worship was met with mixed reactions.
Addressing the nation on Sunday, 20th September, President Yoweri  Museveni finally made the long-awaited announcement.
He had done his best to keep the generally displeased and increasingly aggrieved population of worshippers at bay for a while, having eased the lockdown on other public spaces, but the sanctuaries.
Whereas it was such a wonderful upshot that at long last the doors had been swung open, the potentially upsetting news, though, was that the president capped the number of people that would be allowed to congregate at any one time.
Regardless of the extent of one’s Church or Ministry, the limit is a gloomy 70.
Perhaps that figure could have been proportioned according to size and capacity. For example, in a rural setting, seventy might make for an entire congregation. On the other hand, for the average urban Church, that’s about the size of the choir alone.
Following the President’s pronouncement, Reverend Dr. Stephen Samuel Kaziimba, the Archbishop of the Church of Uganda, welcomed the decision and thanked the Head of State.
Quoting from the book of Acts 5:42, the Archbishop who, in principle appeared to contradict himself—considering the ‘seventy’ ceiling—said: “It is clear that the pattern in the early church was large group public worship in the temple courts and, at the same time, worship at home.”
Speaking of patterns, forty eight hours after the president’s announcement, the leader of the Zoe Fellowship, Prophet Elvis Mbonye, had a fervent response.
During his weekly fellowship on Tuesday 22nd September, to a mammoth audience of over 18,000 viewers that were tuned in from across the globe, the Prophet indicated that what had been apparently given as church opening cannot be considered a church.
“What is said about a Church is; ‘whosoever will, let him come.’ That is the pattern of the scriptures. If it is restrictive, you can’t call that a Church,” Prophet Elvis objected.
Citing the story of the leper on whom Jesus laid hands and healed in Matthew chapter eight, Prophet Elvis Mbonye added: “You can’t call something a church when you are going to restrict the sick from going there.” “Our pattern is Jesus!”
The Prophet’s frame of reference particularly dismantles Lesson Four, Section Two, clause (h) of the Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) guide, which mentions that a religious organization shall: “Provide a room or area for temporarily isolating people who may show signs or symptoms of Covid-19.”
Additionally, Lesson Four, Section Five, clause (b) prohibits the laying of hands: “Laying of hands by the clergy will be temporarily prohibited during service in the current context of Covid-19.”
The peculiarity of having prophetic foresight is the ability to see beyond the physical elements and detect a sly intruder. The downside of overlooking spiritual gifts is the inability to notice that there has been an outright invasion of the church by the state.
For instance, the limit of seventy per gathering effectively places a restriction on the number of people that will give their lives to the Lord.
Such has been the audacity of the president, his scientists and politicians, that do not seem to recognise and take seriously the fact that the Bride they are flirting with belongs to somebody else—Jesus!
Also, the autocratic SOP clauses pretty much set the platform for Mr. Museveni to guilefully inch his way towards the place of supreme spiritual leadership over the nation of Uganda, where he can determine how religious institutions should or should not operate.
For years, there has been a tug of war between the state and religious entities over a proposed Religious Faith Organisations Policy (RFO) which, many argue, carries a repressive spirit—the reason they have consistently rejected it each time it has reared its ugly head.
Incidentally, the SOPs bear just about all the hallmarks of the RFO and appear to be a reincarnation of the same. It’s not surprising, therefore, to see the rift that this has caused in the church.
Essentially, the split in opinion regarding the re-opening of places of worship leaves two options. To either embrace the development along with the clearly oppressive regulations, or, for the likes of Prophet Elvis Mbonye who prefer to maintain certain patterns or standards, stick to online assemblies until the storm blows itself out.
 
The post Opinion: Proposed SOPs for religious organisations contradict Biblical pattern appeared first on UGNEWS24.

Related Articles

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.

Back to top button

Adblock Detected

Please consider supporting us by disabling your ad blocker